Wevyn Muganda is an international development strategist and project manager working at the intersection of gender equality, peacebuilding, and digital innovation. She has over eight years of experience designing, managing, and scaling programs at grassroots, regional, and global levels, with a strong focus on accountability, reporting systems, and operational effectiveness for nonprofit and social impact organisations.
Her work spans Africa, South Asia, and global policy spaces, including high-level engagements with the United Nations, African Union, World Bank, and international civil society networks. Wevyn is widely recognised for her ability to translate complex policies, donor strategies, and research into practical systems and initiatives that function effectively in real-world implementation contexts.
She has led and contributed to award-winning projects and advocacy initiatives advancing human rights, social justice, gender equality, and meaningful youth engagement. Her approach bridges strategy and execution, ensuring that ambitious goals are supported by systems that enable delivery, learning, and accountability.
Wevyn holds a Postgraduate Diploma in International Gender Studies from the University of Iceland, an undergraduate degree in Actuarial Science from the University of Eldoret, and is a graduate of the Leadership, Organizing, and Action Program at Harvard Kennedy School. She has served in advisory roles with UNICEF Generation Unlimited, the World Bank Solutions for Youth Employment initiative, and the Internet Society.
She currently serves as Chair of the Board of Directors of Chalkback Inc. and Arctive Citizens Kenya, and is a Founding Board Member of Haki Data Lab.
Most NGOs today are quietly running two reporting systems — one for donors and one for management. This structural divide undermines programme quality and accountability.
Most NGO reporting systems are designed around a single moment in time: the reporting deadline. This retrospective design makes them a poor tool for risk management, learning, or adaptive delivery.
NGO reporting systems are power systems. They shape who defines success, who controls information, who carries risk, and whose realities are made visible or invisible.
2026 is the year to get NGO reporting right. This checklist helps you evaluate reporting systems in a practical, field-aligned way so you can make an informed choice before the next audit cycle begins.
Even when NGO leaders know their reporting systems are slowing them down, most organisations hesitate to change. Changing NGO reporting systems isn't just about software — it touches power, risk, and donor trust.
Good NGO reporting is surprisingly invisible. When reporting systems work well, reports are generated without panic, audits are manageable, and donors ask fewer follow-up questions.
Most digital reporting tools assume stable internet. For organisations in rural, peri-urban, or crisis-affected contexts, this creates a quiet but persistent barrier.
The first quarter is the ideal time to address reporting challenges. Proactive improvements in Q1 allow NGOs to align workflows, prevent data fragmentation, and build donor confidence.
Many so-called capacity gaps are not about people at all. They are about systems that were never designed for how nonprofit work actually happens.
Information doesn't flow in neat lines inside NGOs. It moves in bits and pieces across spreadsheets, shared drives, email threads, and sometimes even sticky notes.
Most reporting challenges are not caused by poor performance, but by misaligned expectations between program teams, finance, and donors.
Reporting feels hard not because teams are failing, but because the systems they're given don't match how their work actually happens.
Join the Field2Donor waitlist and be among the first to experience fast, transparent NGO reporting.
Get Early Access